AmericanConscience.Org
A voice in the wilderness
|
Intellectual Capital / Foreign Student Hemorrhage
We are watching a decline in academics and science that matches our decline in economic,
political, and moral leadership.
At the behest of short-sighted corporate interests, we are encouraging economic trends that
will make America irrelevant to the world's future.
We are outsourcing our brains.
The concurrent strategy of making government smaller by cutting the budgets of the major
federal agencies that fund science and engineering (like NSF, NASA, and DOE, etc.) will
result in a less competitive America.
Corporatists, of course, understand that you have to invest in your future. But corporatists
run global companies and by using foreign talent, foreign manufacturing, and foreign
research and development initiatives -- they are investing in their future. It's just not a future
that includes America.
Corporate interests are not the same as national interests.
And as long as we allow corporate interests to run America, we will have no future.
ehj2
The New York Times
2004.12.21
U.S. Slips in Attracting the World's Best Students
By Sam Dillon
American universities, which for half a century have attracted the world's best and brightest
students with little effort, are suddenly facing intense competition as higher education
undergoes rapid globalization.
The European Union, moving methodically to compete with American universities, is
streamlining the continent's higher education system and offering American-style degree
programs taught in English. Britain, Australia and New Zealand are aggressively recruiting
foreign students, as are Asian centers like Taiwan and Hong Kong. And China, which has
declared that transforming 100 universities into world-class research institutions is a
national priority, is persuading top Chinese scholars to return home from American
universities.
"What we're starting to see in terms of international students now having options outside
the U.S. for high-quality education is just the tip of the iceberg," said David G. Payne, an
executive director of the Educational Testing Service, which administers several tests
taken by foreign students to gain admission to American universities. "Other countries are
just starting to expand their capacity for offering graduate education. In the future, foreign
students will have far greater opportunities."
Foreign students contribute $13 billion to the American economy annually. But this year
brought clear signs that the United States' overwhelming dominance of international higher
education may be ending. In July, Mr. Payne briefed the National Academy of Sciences on
a sharp plunge in the number of students from India and China who had taken the most
recent administration of the Graduate Record Exam, a requirement for applying to most
graduate schools; it had dropped by half.
Foreign applications to American graduate schools declined 28 percent this year. Actual
foreign graduate student enrollments dropped 6 percent. Enrollments of all foreign
students, in undergraduate, graduate and postdoctoral programs, fell for the first time in
three decades in an annual census released this fall. Meanwhile, university enrollments
have been surging in England, Germany and other countries.
Some of the American decline, experts agree, is due to post-Sept. 11 delays in processing
student visas, which have discouraged thousands of students, not only from the Middle
East but also from dozens of other nations, from enrolling in the United States. American
educators and even some foreign ones say the visa difficulties are helping foreign schools
increase their share of the market.
"International education is big business for all of the Anglophone countries, and the U.S.
traditionally has dominated the market without having to try very hard," said Tim O'Brien,
international development director at Nottingham Trent University in England. "Now
Australia, the U.K., Ireland, New Zealand and Canada are competing for that dollar, and
our lives have been made easier because of the difficulties that students are having
getting into the U.S.
"International students say it's not worth queuing up for two days outside the U.S.
consulate in whatever country they are in to get a visa when they can go to the U.K. so
much more easily."
American educators have been concerned since the fall of 2002, when large numbers of
foreign students experienced delays in visa processing. But few noticed the rapid
emergence of higher education as a global industry until quite recently.
"Many U.S. campuses have not yet geared up for the competition," said Peggy Blumenthal,
a vice president at the Institute for International Education.
Still, Ms. Blumenthal said, it remains unclear whether the sudden decline in foreign
enrollments is a one-time drop or the beginning of a long slide.
Not all educators are expressing concern.
Steven B. Sample, president of the University of Southern California - which last year had
6,647 foreign students, the most of any American university - said colleagues who lead
other universities had expressed anxiety at professional meetings.
"But we compete no holds barred among ourselves for the best faculty, for students, for
gifts and for grants, and that's one of the reasons for our strength," Dr. Sample said. "Now
we'll compete with some overseas universities. Fine with me, bring 'em on."
Certainly many American universities continue to be extraordinary global brand names.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University has compiled an online academic ranking of 500 world
universities, using criteria like the number of Nobel Prizes won by faculty members and
academic articles published (see here). Of the top 20 on the list, 17 are American. Of the
top 500, 170 are American.
During 2002, the most recent year for which comparable figures are available, some
586,000 foreign students were enrolled in United States universities, compared with about
270,000 in Britain, the world's second-largest higher education destination, and 227,000 in
Germany, the third-largest. Foreign enrollments increased by 15 percent that year in
Britain, and in Germany by 10 percent.
The countries exporting the most students were China, South Korea and India, but the
annual global migration to overseas universities involves two million students from many
countries traveling in many directions. That number is exploding - by some estimates it will
quadruple by 2025 - as economic growth produces millions of new middle-class students
across Asia.
In October, the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation, an economic
forum for 30 leading industrial nations, took note of this global movement in a study.
Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin, an analyst at the organization's headquarters in Paris and an
author of the study, said that traditionally most countries, including the United States, had
tried to attract foreign students as a way of disseminating their nation's core values.
But three other strategies emerged in the 1990's, Dr. Vincent-Lancrin said. Countries
with aging populations like Canada and Germany, pursuing a "skilled migration"
approach, have sought to recruit talented students in strategic disciplines and to
encourage them to settle after graduation. Germany subsidizes foreign students
so generously that their education is free.
Australia and New Zealand, pursuing a "revenue generating" approach, treat higher
education as an industry, charging foreign students full tuition. They compete effectively in
the world market because they offer quality education and the costs of attaining some
degrees in those countries are lower than in the United States. Emerging countries like
India, China and Singapore, pursuing a "capacity building" approach, view study abroad by
thousands of their nation's students as a way of training future professors and researchers
for their own university systems, which are expanding rapidly, Dr. Vincent-Lancrin said.
In August a delegation of education officials from Singapore visited Mary Sue Coleman, the
president of the University of Michigan, at the Ann Arbor campus. They took over a
conference room, set up computers and peppered her with questions about tuition policy,
fund-raising, governance and research, Dr. Coleman recalled. They wanted to know how
Michigan became a prominent university, and how it was run today.
"Eventually they'll reap the benefits of this work," Dr. Coleman said. "Singapore will create
world-class universities. Other countries are taking the same approach. We're going to
have enormous competition. We'd better be prepared for it."
The rapid changes in India and China have special importance. The number of Indian
students in the United States has more than doubled in a decade, to 80,000, the largest
representation of any country. The 62,000 students from China make up the
second-largest group. Graduate students and degree holders from those countries play a
critical role in American science, engineering and information technology research.
Some 28 percent fewer Indian students applied to attend American graduate
schools this fall than last year, according to a survey by the Council of Graduate
Schools. This matched the overall decline for all foreign students.
Rabindranath Panda, the education consul at India's consulate in New York, said that huge
private investments in Indian higher education in recent years had greatly increased
options at home for Indian students, and that those who wished to study abroad were
increasingly looking at universities not only in the United States and Britain but also in
France, Germany, Singapore and elsewhere.
Higher education is undergoing even more sweeping transformation in China. The number
of students seeking a postsecondary degree is expected to rise to 16 million students by
2005 from 11 million in 2000 and to keep rising thereafter, according to a recent report by
the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation. Even if only a small minority
of those new students seek a foreign degree, they will enlarge their already important
presence at hundreds of overseas universities.
But the new wave of Chinese students may not wash into the United States. Educators say
applicants from China face more visa difficulties than applicants from any country outside
the Middle East.
One reason, they say, appears to be that many Chinese students pursue the science
disciplines that set off a screening process known as Visa Mantis, intended to prevent the
transfer of sensitive technology. A Congressional study found that during a three-month
period last year, more than half of all the Visa Mantis investigations worldwide involved
Chinese students. The especially long visa delays experienced by Chinese students are a
major irritant for many university presidents.
"Chinese students are getting heightened scrutiny," said the president of Princeton
University, Shirley M. Tilghman. "I've asked many people for the rationale, but I've never
gotten an answer that makes sense."
Chinese applications to American graduate schools fell 45 percent this year,
while several European countries announced surges in Chinese enrollment.
"We had an especially large increase in Chinese students," said Martina
Nibbeling-Wriessnig, a spokeswoman for the German Embassy in Washington.
The United States is also losing some Chinese scholars, partly because of China's
strategic decision over the last decade to channel special investments to 100 universities
with a view to building them into world-class research giants capable of winning Nobel
Prizes.
In October, Dr. Coleman of the University of Michigan visited Shanghai Jiao Tong
University, which created the online university ranking system and has also built a vast new
campus. Partly because Dr. Coleman is a biochemist, her hosts took her to visit their new
pharmacy school. It had hired 16 professors, she said - all of them returned from American
universities.
But not only Chinese universities are seeking to lure top faculty members from American
campuses.
"Baseball's World Series includes only American teams," said Michael Crow, president of
Arizona State University. "But higher education is truly a world series now, because we're
competing for students and faculty against universities all over the world."
///

Foreign applications to American graduate schools declined 28 percent this year.
Actual foreign graduate student enrollments dropped 6 percent.
Sam Dillon
The New York Times / 2004.12.21